Case 72 / 183 Associate

SPAC Transactions

M&A & Deal Analysis

The prompt

“As an M&A associate evaluating a potential SPAC merger target, you're asked in an interview: "Walk me through how a SPAC is structured from IPO to de-SPAC, how the sponsor actually makes money, and where the conflicts of interest between the sponsor and public shareholders show up."”

📋 What you're given

As an M&A associate evaluating a potential SPAC merger target, you're asked in an interview: "Walk me through how a SPAC is structured from IPO to de-SPAC, how the sponsor actually makes money, and where the conflicts of interest between the sponsor and public shareholders show up."

1. Task Overview

Task: explain how a SPAC moves from its IPO through the de-SPAC merger, quantify what the sponsor's promote is actually worth at closing, and identify the structural conflict of interest that arrangement creates with public shareholders.

Step 1: Given Data — SPAC IPO and Deal Terms

A SPAC has completed its IPO and negotiated a merger with a private target.

Line ItemValue
Trust Account at IPO$300.0m
Public Units Sold30.0m units at $10.00 per unit
Founder ("Sponsor") Shares7.5m shares
Sponsor's At-Risk Capital$8.5m
Public Warrant Coverage1/2 warrant per unit (15.0m warrants)
Warrant Strike Price$11.50
Redemptions at the De-SPAC Vote50% (0.50) of public shares
Reference Share Price$10.00

Step 2: Founder Share Ownership Percentage

Show Founder Ownership Formula

Founder Ownership % = Founder Shares / (Founder Shares + Public Shares)

Using this formula, compute the sponsor's ownership percentage immediately after the IPO.

Step 3: Value of the Sponsor Promote at Closing

Show Promote Value Formula

Promote Value = Founder Shares × Reference Share Price

Using this formula, compute what the founder shares are worth at closing.

Step 4: Trust Cash Remaining After Redemptions

Show Remaining Trust Cash Formula

Remaining Trust Cash = Trust Account × (1 − Redemption %)

Using this formula, compute how much cash actually remains in trust to help fund the deal.

Step 5: Sponsor's Return Multiple and the Conflict of Interest

Show Sponsor Return Multiple Formula

Sponsor Return Multiple = Promote Value / At-Risk Capital

Assume:

  • If no deal closes before the SPAC's deadline, the sponsor forfeits its entire at-risk capital and the trust is liquidated back to public shareholders.
  • Public shareholders may redeem their shares for a pro-rata share of trust cash at the de-SPAC vote and still keep their warrants, regardless of how they vote.

Using this formula and these facts, compute the sponsor's return multiple on its at-risk capital and explain why this payoff structure creates a conflict of interest with public shareholders.

💡 Model answer

Try answering out loud first — then reveal the model answer and compare.

⚠️ Common mistakes

  • Assuming the sponsor's promote is proportional to the capital they put at risk — it isn't, which is exactly the source of the incentive misalignment interviewers are testing for.
  • Ignoring that redemptions shrink the cash actually available to fund the deal, not just the free float of public shares.
  • Treating warrants as immediately dilutive at issuance, when dilution only crystallizes if the strike price is in the money and holders choose to exercise.
  • Confusing the SPAC's original IPO investors with the shareholders who actually vote on and remain in the de-SPAC deal — many IPO investors redeem out before the merger closes.
  • Missing the deadline-pressure dynamic: because the sponsor forfeits its at-risk capital if no deal closes in time, sponsors are structurally biased toward closing a sub-optimal deal rather than returning capital to investors.

🔁 Follow-up questions

Previous Case 71: Earn-Out Structuring

⭐ Rate this case

0 ratings

💬 Comments (0)

No comments yet — be the first to ask a question.

Part of a 183-case learning path. Create a free account to save progress & unlock follow-up answers.
Create free account